Comparison of alternatives
After a thorough analysis of Lusha and GetProspect, we've identified crucial criteria for businesses to choose the perfect email finder tool for finding prospects. But before we discuss these key factors – functionality, additional tools, and price – let's provide a brief description of these outstanding B2B solutions.
GetProspect is a powerful platform with the biggest up-to-date B2B database with 18 million contacts with business emails, and 17 attributes.
With this solution, users can find email addresses and other prospect data in seconds in the GetProspect web app, on LinkedIn, and on any company website.
Lusha is a solution for marketing, sales, and recruiting specialists that has a database with millions of business profiles of decision-makers.
It facilitates the process of finding information about prospects via web app and extension, allowing you to conduct outreach and generate leads.
The ratio of the subscription price - and what you get for that price - is really crucial as it directly impacts the return on investment.
Below we have collected some information about how many valid leads you will get and at what cost.
To make a comparison between the email finders of these platforms, we took 100 popular contacts that were most often saved on GetProspect. In Lusha, it was possible to test only 49 of them.
Well, the sequence of testing:
Looking at the table below, you can see that in GetProspect, the results for finding valid emails and the deliverability rate are higher.
Note. It is critical that the results on the Bounce Rate of your chosen tool were not higher than 5%. It will save your reputation and your domain and ensure that you get right into the Inbox of prospects and customers.
GetProspect Email finder has the advanced email search filters
The best free subscription that allows you to fully test the product
Advantageous tariff plans without unnecessary restrictions
GetProspect has more advanced email finder filters for looking up prospects via email, making user search more accurate than Lusha.
Besides, all the filters for finding prospects are available here in any plan (even with a free subscription), while in Lusha you don't have access to such essential filters as Technologies and Job changes even with Pro and Premium subscriptions.
Same situation as with the free plans. At Lusha alternative - GetProspect, you only need one $49 payment per month (1k valid emails, 2k verifications, etc.) to use all the features of the platform and work as a team without paying per user.
On the contrary, in Lusha, if you pay $39, you get only 40 credits (for one user only). If you want to add, e.g., 40 credits and add a user, the price jumps to $78 per month. That is, the most seemingly low-priced solution at first glance is not the most profitable.
And besides, even in the paid starter plan, Lusha has enough limitations, unlike GetProspect. For example, you can't access prospecting bulk shows and basic usage analytics.
Note. When choosing a prospecting platform, consider its full range of features, including data exports, dashboard reports for tracking results, and more.
These features are also important when choosing a tool to find email addresses and continue to lead the prospect through the sales funnel in one place, thereby streamlining the work and increasing the results.
Interested to see more tools similar to Lusha? To view other comparisons, go here.
